Peter v. NantKwest, Inc.
Peter v. NantKwest Inc., 589 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case from the October 2019 term. In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) was not entitled to be reimbursed for attorney's fees from patent applicants who file appeals against USPTO decisions. This case attracted attention from many intellectual property and law associations, many of whom (including the American Bar Association) filed friend-of-the-court briefs arguing against the government's request for attorney's fees from the plaintiff.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Peter v. NantKwest, Inc.
Peter v. NantKwest Inc., 589 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case from the October 2019 term. In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) was not entitled to be reimbursed for attorney's fees from patent applicants who file appeals against USPTO decisions. This case attracted attention from many intellectual property and law associations, many of whom (including the American Bar Association) filed friend-of-the-court briefs arguing against the government's request for attorney's fees from the plaintiff.
has abstract
Peter v. NantKwest Inc., 589 U ...... ney's fees from the plaintiff.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
62,574,888
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,010,749,110
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Peter v. NantKwest,
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
Peter, Deputy Director, Patent and Trademark Office v. NantKwest, Inc.
@en
Holding
USPTO cannot recover the salar ...... section 145 of the Patent Act.
@en
JoinMajority
unanimous
@en
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
Peter v. NantKwest, Inc.
@en
majority
Sotomayor
@en
OpinionAnnouncement
other source
Supreme Court
@en
other url
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Peter v. NantKwest Inc., 589 U ...... ney's fees from the plaintiff.
@en
label
Peter v. NantKwest, Inc.
@en
sameAs
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Peter, Deputy Director, Patent and Trademark Office v. NantKwest, Inc.
@en