Rowe v Electoral Commissioner
Rowe v Electoral Commissioner is a High Court of Australia case dealing with the requirement of the Australian Constitution that members of Parliament be "directly chosen by the people". The High Court held that Commonwealth legislation that sought to restrict the time in which a person may seek to enroll in an election or alter their enrolment details after the writs for an election have been issued was invalid.
primaryTopic
Rowe v Electoral Commissioner
Rowe v Electoral Commissioner is a High Court of Australia case dealing with the requirement of the Australian Constitution that members of Parliament be "directly chosen by the people". The High Court held that Commonwealth legislation that sought to restrict the time in which a person may seek to enroll in an election or alter their enrolment details after the writs for an election have been issued was invalid.
has abstract
Rowe v Electoral Commissioner ...... have been issued was invalid.
@en
Wikipage page ID
28,335,945
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,017,014,626
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
citations
date decided
full name
Rowe & Anor v Electoral Commissioner & Anor
@en
judges
French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ
@en
name
Rowe v Electoral Commissioner
@en
opinions
transcripts
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
type
comment
Rowe v Electoral Commissioner ...... have been issued was invalid.
@en
label
Rowe v Electoral Commissioner
@en