Smith v. Doe
Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 (2003), was a court case in the United States which questioned the constitutionality of the Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act's retroactive requirements. Under the Act, any sex offender must register with the Department of Corrections or local law enforcement within one business day of entering the state. This information is forwarded to the Department of Public Safety, which maintains a public database. Fingerprints, social security number, anticipated change of address, and medical treatment after the offense are kept confidential. The offender's name, aliases, address, photograph, physical description, driver's license number, motor vehicle identification numbers, place of employment, date of birth, crime, date and place of conviction, and length and conditi
Wikipage redirect
538 U.S. 84Constitutionality of sex offender registries in the United StatesDangerous offenderEx post facto lawJohn_RobertsKansas v. HendricksList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist CourtSex offender registries in the United StatesSexually violent predator lawsSmith v DoeUnited States National Sex Offenders Public RegistryUnited States v. Kebodeaux
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Smith v. Doe
Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 (2003), was a court case in the United States which questioned the constitutionality of the Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act's retroactive requirements. Under the Act, any sex offender must register with the Department of Corrections or local law enforcement within one business day of entering the state. This information is forwarded to the Department of Public Safety, which maintains a public database. Fingerprints, social security number, anticipated change of address, and medical treatment after the offense are kept confidential. The offender's name, aliases, address, photograph, physical description, driver's license number, motor vehicle identification numbers, place of employment, date of birth, crime, date and place of conviction, and length and conditi
has abstract
Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 (200 ...... ve and violated ex post facto.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,017,640,233
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Smith v. Doe,
@en
Concurrence
Souter
@en
Thomas
@en
cornell
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Ginsburg
@en
Stevens
@en
findlaw
fullname
Delbert W. Smith and Bruce M. Botelho, Petitioners v. John Doe I et al.
@en
Holding
Because the Alaska Sex Offende ...... late the ex post facto clause.
@en
JoinDissent
Breyer
@en
JoinMajority
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas
@en
justia
Litigants
Smith v. Doe
@en
majority
Kennedy
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 (200 ...... iction, and length and conditi
@en
label
Smith v. Doe
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Delbert W. Smith andBruce M. Botelho, Petitioners v. John Doe I et al.
@en