Smith v. Pilots Union
Smith v. Pilots Union, 296 F.3d 380 (5th Cir. 2002), is a court case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that although third officer aboard an oceangoing cargo vessel was a supervisor, the six-month period of limitations of § 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act still applies to Smith's suit against the union whether or not he was a supervisor.
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Smith v. Pilots Union
Smith v. Pilots Union, 296 F.3d 380 (5th Cir. 2002), is a court case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that although third officer aboard an oceangoing cargo vessel was a supervisor, the six-month period of limitations of § 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act still applies to Smith's suit against the union whether or not he was a supervisor.
has abstract
Smith v. Pilots Union, 296 F.3 ...... er or not he was a supervisor.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
34,105,318
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,004,673,925
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
case
citations
DecideDate
DecideYear
first
Beth E.
@en
Timothy A.
@en
fullname
Stuart H. Smith , Jr. v. International Organization Of Masters, Mates and Pilots
@en
googlescholar
JoinMajority
a unanimous court
@en
journal
Ohio St. L.J.
@en
Tex. Tech L. Rev.
@en
justia
last
Kelley
@en
Klusmann
@en
LawsApplied
National Labor Relations Act § 10,
@en
Litigants
Smith v. Pilots Union
@en
majority
Garza
@en
Prior
Appeal from the United States ...... of Louisiana, at New Orleans.
@en
Subsequent
Appeal to the United States Supreme Court
@en
title
Labor Law Gap-Filling: Federal Common Law Ideals versus Litigation Realities
@en
Labor and Employment Law
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Smith v. Pilots Union, 296 F.3 ...... er or not he was a supervisor.
@en
label
Smith v. Pilots Union
@en