Ulmus 'Louis van Houtte'
Ulmus 'Louis van Houtte' (Syn. Ulmus 'Vanhouttei') is believed to have been first cultivated in Ghent, Belgium circa 1863. It was first mentioned by Franz Deegen in 1886. It was once thought a cultivar of English Elm Ulmus minor 'Atinia', though this derivation has long been questioned; W. J. Bean called it "an elm of uncertain status". Its dissimilarity from the type and its Belgian provenance make the 'Atinia' attribution unlikely. Fontaine (1968) considered it probably a form of U. × hollandica.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Ulmus 'Louis van Houtte'
Ulmus 'Louis van Houtte' (Syn. Ulmus 'Vanhouttei') is believed to have been first cultivated in Ghent, Belgium circa 1863. It was first mentioned by Franz Deegen in 1886. It was once thought a cultivar of English Elm Ulmus minor 'Atinia', though this derivation has long been questioned; W. J. Bean called it "an elm of uncertain status". Its dissimilarity from the type and its Belgian provenance make the 'Atinia' attribution unlikely. Fontaine (1968) considered it probably a form of U. × hollandica.
has abstract
Ulmus 'Louis van Houtte' (Syn. ...... Benoit van Houtte, 1810–1876.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,013,863,593
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
cultivar
'Louis van Houtte'
@en
genus
Ulmus
@en
image caption
'Louis van Houtte' in Christchurch Botanic Gardens, New Zealand
@en
name
Ulmus 'Louis van Houtte'
@en
origin
Belgium
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
comment
Ulmus 'Louis van Houtte' (Syn. ...... bly a form of U. × hollandica.
@en
label
Ulmus 'Louis van Houtte'
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Ulmus 'Louis van Houtte'
@en