United States v. Cruikshank
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), was an important United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Bill of Rights did not apply to private actors or to state governments despite the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. It reversed criminal convictions for the civil rights violations committed in aid of anti-reconstruction murders. Decided during the Reconstruction Era, the case represented a major blow to federal efforts to protect the civil rights of African Americans.
Wikipage disambiguates
92 U.S. 542Barron v. BaltimoreBlack suffrage in the United StatesCharles Lane (journalist)Civil Rights CasesConstitution of LouisianaCriminal law in the Waite CourtCruikshankDe Jonge v. OregonDisfranchisement after the Reconstruction eraDistrict of Columbia v. HellerDouble Jeopardy ClauseEnforcement Act of 1870Enforcement ActsFifteenth Amendment to the United States ConstitutionFirst Amendment to the United States ConstitutionFourteenth Amendment to the United States ConstitutionGun politics in the United StatesHall v. DecuirHodges v. United StatesIn Search of the Second AmendmentIncorporation of the Bill of RightsIndex of articles related to African AmericansJohn_BinghamJoseph P. BradleyKilbourn v. ThompsonList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Waite CourtList of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First AmendmentList of certificates of division in criminal casesList of firearm court cases in the United StatesList of landmark African-American legislationList of landmark court decisions in the United StatesMcDonald v. City of ChicagoMorrison WaitePeople v. AguilarPresidency of Ulysses S. GrantPresser v. IllinoisReconstruction eraRepublic
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
United States v. Cruikshank
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), was an important United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Bill of Rights did not apply to private actors or to state governments despite the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. It reversed criminal convictions for the civil rights violations committed in aid of anti-reconstruction murders. Decided during the Reconstruction Era, the case represented a major blow to federal efforts to protect the civil rights of African Americans.
has abstract
United States v. Cruikshank, 9 ...... ald v. City of Chicago (2010).
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,021,250,874
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDateA
ArgueDateB
ArgueYear
case
United States v. Cruikshank,
@en
Concurrence/Dissent
Clifford
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
United States v. Cruikshank, et al.
@en
Holding
The First Amendment right to a ...... the states or private actors.
@en
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
Davis, Bradley, Hunt
@en
JoinMajority
Swayne, Miller, Field, Strong
@en
justia
Litigants
United States v. Cruikshank
@en
majority
Waite
@en
openjurist
Overruled
@en
De Jonge v. Oregon
@en
McDonald v. City of Chicago
@en
ParallelCitations
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
United States v. Cruikshank, 9 ...... l rights of African Americans.
@en
label
United States v. Cruikshank
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
United States v. Cruikshank, et al.
@en