United States v. John (2010)
In United States v. John, 597 F.3d 263 (2010) United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit interpreted the term "exceeds authorized access" in the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act 18 U.S.C. §1030(e)(6) and concluded that access to a computer may be exceeded if the purposes for which access has been given are exceeded. In particular, the court ruled that an employee would exceed authorized access to a protected computer if he or she used that access to obtain or steal information as part of criminal scheme.
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
United States v. John (2010)
In United States v. John, 597 F.3d 263 (2010) United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit interpreted the term "exceeds authorized access" in the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act 18 U.S.C. §1030(e)(6) and concluded that access to a computer may be exceeded if the purposes for which access has been given are exceeded. In particular, the court ruled that an employee would exceed authorized access to a protected computer if he or she used that access to obtain or steal information as part of criminal scheme.
has abstract
In United States v. John, 597 ...... cess for the purposes of CFAA.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
34,920,470
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
910,800,574
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
citations
date decided
2010-02-09
decision by
full name
United States of America v. Dimetriace Eva Lavon John
@en
judges
Jerry E. Smith, Priscilla Owen and Catharina Haynes
@en
keywords
name
United States v. John
@en
opinions
The Fifth Circuit affirmed app ...... anded for further proceedings.
@en
prior actions
District Court for the Norther ...... er's computer internal system.
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
In United States v. John, 597 ...... on as part of criminal scheme.
@en
label
United States v. John (2010)
@en