United States v. Progressive, Inc.
United States of America v. Progressive, Inc., Erwin Knoll, Samuel Day, Jr., and Howard Morland, 467 F. Supp. 990 (W.D. Wis. 1979), was a lawsuit brought against The Progressive magazine by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) in 1979. A temporary injunction was granted against The Progressive to prevent the publication of an article written by activist Howard Morland that purported to reveal the "secret" of the hydrogen bomb. Though the information had been compiled from publicly available sources, the DOE claimed that it fell under the "born secret" clause of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
USA v. The Progressive et alUSA vs. The Progressive, et al.United States of America v. Progressive, Inc., Erwin Knoll, Samuel Day, Jr., and Howard MorlandUnited States v. ProgressiveUnited States v. Progressive, IncUnited States v. The ProgressiveUnited States v. The Progressive, Inc.United States v. The Progressive, et al.
Wikipage redirect
Aviam SoiferBorn secretCensorship in the United StatesFusion Energy FoundationHistory of the Teller–Ulam designHoward MorlandIn cameraJohn Aristotle PhillipsList of Eagle ScoutsList of environmental lawsuitsMadison,_WisconsinNth Country ExperimentNuclear weapons in popular cultureOfficial Secrets ActPrior restraintRay KidderThe ProgressiveThermonuclear weaponUSA v. The Progressive et alUSA vs. The Progressive, et al.United States of America v. Progressive, Inc., Erwin Knoll, Samuel Day, Jr., and Howard MorlandUnited States v. ProgressiveUnited States v. Progressive, IncUnited States v. The ProgressiveUnited States v. The Progressive, Inc.United States v. The Progressive, et al.
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
United States v. Progressive, Inc.
United States of America v. Progressive, Inc., Erwin Knoll, Samuel Day, Jr., and Howard Morland, 467 F. Supp. 990 (W.D. Wis. 1979), was a lawsuit brought against The Progressive magazine by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) in 1979. A temporary injunction was granted against The Progressive to prevent the publication of an article written by activist Howard Morland that purported to reveal the "secret" of the hydrogen bomb. Though the information had been compiled from publicly available sources, the DOE claimed that it fell under the "born secret" clause of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
has abstract
United States of America v. Pr ...... attached to prior restraints".
@en
美利坚合众国诉进步公司、欧文·诺尔、小塞缪尔·戴和霍华德·莫 ...... 来检测有关(prior restraint)违宪性的极限”。
@zh
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,021,221,055
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
caption
Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
@en
citations
date decided
1979-03-28
full name
United States of America v. Pr ...... Day, Jr., and Howard Morland.
@en
imagealt
A Romanesque style building on ...... ghts and street lights are on.
@en
imagesize
judges
name
United States of America v. Progressive, Inc.
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
United States of America v. Pr ...... the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
@en
美利坚合众国诉进步公司、欧文·诺尔、小塞缪尔·戴和霍华德·莫 ...... 席听证会,但他们被禁止将听证会上的任何信息透露给各自的客户。
@zh
label
United States v. Progressive, Inc.
@en
美利坚合众国诉进步案
@zh