Ware v. Hylton
Ware v. Hylton, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 199 (1796), also known as the British Debt Case, is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that treaties take precedence over state law under the U.S. Constitution. Ware was the first major case concerned with treaties, the first to rule that treaty provisions were as binding as domestic U.S. law, and the first to affirm the supremacy of federal law over state law. It is also notable for articulating the legal doctrine that would later be known as judicial review, whereby federal courts have the authority to settle conflicts of law.
Wikipage redirect
3 U.S. 199Bricker AmendmentClerke v. HarwoodHistory of the United States ConstitutionHylton v. United StatesJames Wilson (founding father)John_MarshallJudicial review in the United StatesList of landmark court decisions in the United StatesMedellín v. TexasPatrick HenrySupremacy ClauseUnited States and the International Criminal CourtWare v HyltonWilliam Cushing
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Ware v. Hylton
Ware v. Hylton, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 199 (1796), also known as the British Debt Case, is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that treaties take precedence over state law under the U.S. Constitution. Ware was the first major case concerned with treaties, the first to rule that treaty provisions were as binding as domestic U.S. law, and the first to affirm the supremacy of federal law over state law. It is also notable for articulating the legal doctrine that would later be known as judicial review, whereby federal courts have the authority to settle conflicts of law.
has abstract
Ware v. Hylton, 3 U.S. (3 Dall ...... ty to settle conflicts of law.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
25,754,434
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
994,079,451
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Paterson
@en
fullname
Ware, administrator of Jones, Plaintiff in Error v. Hylton et al.
@en
Holding
Treaties made under the Constitution supersede state law.
@en
justia
Litigants
Ware v. Hylton
@en
NotParticipating
Ellsworth
@en
ParallelCitations
Prior
Appeal from the Virginia Circuit Court
@en
Seriatim
Chase
@en
Cushing
@en
Iredell
@en
Wilson
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Ware v. Hylton, 3 U.S. (3 Dall ...... ty to settle conflicts of law.
@en
label
Ware v. Hylton
@en
sameAs
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Ware, administrator of Jones, Plaintiff in Error v. Hylton et al.
@en