Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that preliminary work activities, where controlled by the employer and performed entirely for the employer's benefit, are properly included as working time under Fair Labor Standards Act. The decision is known as the "portal to portal case." The Supreme Court reaffirmed Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery in its 2016 ruling in Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo, No. 14-1146 (March 22, 2016).
primaryTopic
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that preliminary work activities, where controlled by the employer and performed entirely for the employer's benefit, are properly included as working time under Fair Labor Standards Act. The decision is known as the "portal to portal case." The Supreme Court reaffirmed Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery in its 2016 ruling in Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo, No. 14-1146 (March 22, 2016).
has abstract
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Potter ...... No. 14-1146 (March 22, 2016).
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
10,546,322
Wikipage revision ID
744,044,017
Abrogated
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
bot
InternetArchiveBot
date
DecideDate
DecideYear
fix-attempted
Holding
Preliminary work activities, w ...... nder Fair Labor Standards Act.
JoinDissent
JoinMajority
Black, Reed, Douglas, Rutledge
Litigants
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
majority
NotParticipating
ParallelCitations
Prior
On appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
SCOTUS
Subsequent
Petition for rehearing den'd., 329 U.S. 822,
subject
comment
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Potter ...... No. 14-1146 (March 22, 2016).
@en
label
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Anderson, et al. v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
@en