Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia (AG)
Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia (AG), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 657, 2004 SCC 78 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada wherein the Court ruled that government funding for non-core medically necessary treatments is not protected under section 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia (AG)
Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia (AG), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 657, 2004 SCC 78 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada wherein the Court ruled that government funding for non-core medically necessary treatments is not protected under section 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
has abstract
Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v ...... harter of Rights and Freedoms.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
644,056,274
case-name
Auton v British Columbia
citations
[2004] 3 S.C.R. 657, 2004 SCC 78
decided-date
2004-11-19
Docket
full-case-name
Attorney General of British Co ...... earce in her personal capacity
heard-date
2004-06-09
history
Judgement against British Columbia in the British Columbia Court of Appeal.
NotParticipating
Iacobucci and Arbour JJ.
ratio
Not providing government fundi ...... harter of Rights and Freedoms.
ruling
Appeal allowed.
Unanimous
McLachlin C.J.
hypernym
comment
Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v ...... harter of Rights and Freedoms.
@en
label
Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia (AG)
@en