Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, Inc.
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, Inc., 650 F.3d 876 (2d Cir. 2011), was a case decided in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit where the Second Circuit, reversing the decision of the US District Court below it, found that the claims of three major financial investment firms (Barclays Investment Bank, Morgan Stanley, and Merrill Lynch) against an internet subscription stock news service (theflyonthewall.com) for "Hot-news" Misappropriation under state common law doctrine could not stand, as they were pre-empted by several sections of the Federal Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. § 106, 17 U.S.C. § 102, and 17 U.S.C. § 103).
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, Inc.
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, Inc., 650 F.3d 876 (2d Cir. 2011), was a case decided in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit where the Second Circuit, reversing the decision of the US District Court below it, found that the claims of three major financial investment firms (Barclays Investment Bank, Morgan Stanley, and Merrill Lynch) against an internet subscription stock news service (theflyonthewall.com) for "Hot-news" Misappropriation under state common law doctrine could not stand, as they were pre-empted by several sections of the Federal Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. § 106, 17 U.S.C. § 102, and 17 U.S.C. § 103).
has abstract
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Thefl ...... t least in the Second Circuit.
@en
Wikipage page ID
44,379,989
Wikipage revision ID
722,241,650
date argued
2010-08-06
date decided
2011-06-20
full name
Barclay's Capital Inc., Merril ...... om, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
judges
Pooler, Raggi, and Sack
name
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, Inc.
opinions
Sack - majority, Raggi - separate concurring
subject
comment
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Thefl ...... . § 102, and 17 U.S.C. § 103).
@en
label
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, Inc.
@en