Bennis v. Michigan
Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the innocent owner defense is not constitutionally mandated by Fourteenth Amendment Due Process in cases of civil forfeiture.
Wikipage disambiguates
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Bennis v. Michigan
Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the innocent owner defense is not constitutionally mandated by Fourteenth Amendment Due Process in cases of civil forfeiture.
has abstract
Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 4 ...... under this Court's decisions.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
18,492,986
Wikipage revision ID
727,845,428
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Bennis v. Michigan
citation
cornell
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
The forfeiture order did not o ...... Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
JoinDissent
Souter, Breyer
JoinMajority
O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg
justia
Litigants
Bennis v. Michigan
majority
Prior
Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 4 ...... in cases of civil forfeiture.
@en
label
Bennis v. Michigan
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Tina B. Bennis v. Michigan
@en