Escobedo v. Illinois
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. The case was decided a year after the court held in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) that indigent criminal defendants had a right to be provided counsel at trial.
Wikipage disambiguates
primaryTopic
Escobedo v. Illinois
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. The case was decided a year after the court held in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) that indigent criminal defendants had a right to be provided counsel at trial.
has abstract
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. ...... be provided counsel at trial.
@en
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
744,409,285
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
citation
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
Where a police investigation b ...... ements to police are excluded.
JoinDissent
Stewart, Clark
JoinMajority
Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan
LawsApplied
U.S. Const. amends. VI, XIV
Litigants
Escobedo v. Illinois
majority
Prior
SCOTUS
Subsequent
reversed and remanded
subject
comment
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. ...... be provided counsel at trial.
@en
label
Escobedo v. Illinois
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Escobedo v. Illinois
@en