Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.
Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U.S. 127 (1948) is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that a facially trivial implementation of a natural principle or phenomenon of nature is not eligible for a patent.
primaryTopic
Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.
Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U.S. 127 (1948) is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that a facially trivial implementation of a natural principle or phenomenon of nature is not eligible for a patent.
has abstract
Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo ...... is not eligible for a patent.
@en
Wikipage page ID
21,327,644
Wikipage revision ID
703,225,238
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U.S. 127
citation
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
Holding
The properties of inhibition o ...... not subject to being patented.
JoinDissent
JoinMajority
Vinson, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Murphy, Rutledge
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.
majority
Prior
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo ...... is not eligible for a patent.
@en
label
Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.
@en