Granholm v. Heald
Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), was a court case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in a 5-4 decision that ruled that laws in New York and Michigan that permitted in-state wineries to ship wine directly to consumers, but prohibited out-of-state wineries from doing the same, were unconstitutional. The case was unusual because the arguments centered on the rarely invoked 21st Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1933, which ended Prohibition in the United States.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Granholm v. Heald
Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), was a court case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in a 5-4 decision that ruled that laws in New York and Michigan that permitted in-state wineries to ship wine directly to consumers, but prohibited out-of-state wineries from doing the same, were unconstitutional. The case was unusual because the arguments centered on the rarely invoked 21st Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1933, which ended Prohibition in the United States.
has abstract
Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 46 ...... hibition in the United States.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
742,260,549
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
citation
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
The 21st Amendment grant of re ...... ing Michigan statute affirmed.
JoinDissent
Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor
JoinMajority
Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
LawsApplied
Litigants
Granholm v. Heald
majority
Prior
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 46 ...... hibition in the United States.
@en
label
Granholm v. Heald
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Jennifer M. Granholm, Governor ...... State Liquor Authority, et al.
@en