Gratz v. Bollinger
Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. In a 6–3 decision announced on June 23, 2003, Chief Justice Rehnquist, writing for the Court, ruled the University's point system's "predetermined point allocations" that awarded 20 points to underrepresented minorities "ensures that the diversity contributions of applicants cannot be individually assessed" and was therefore unconstitutional.
Wikipage disambiguates
primaryTopic
Gratz v. Bollinger
Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. In a 6–3 decision announced on June 23, 2003, Chief Justice Rehnquist, writing for the Court, ruled the University's point system's "predetermined point allocations" that awarded 20 points to underrepresented minorities "ensures that the diversity contributions of applicants cannot be individually assessed" and was therefore unconstitutional.
has abstract
Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 2 ...... as therefore unconstitutional.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
733,738,589
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
citation
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
A state university's admission ...... ing individual determinations.
JoinConcurrence
JoinDissent
JoinMajority
O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
Litigants
Gratz v. Bollinger
majority
Prior
SCOTUS
Subsequent
On remand, 80 Fed. Appx. 417
subject
comment
Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 2 ...... as therefore unconstitutional.
@en
label
Gratz v. Bollinger
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Jennifer Gratz and Patrick Hamacher v.Lee Bollinger, et al.
@en