Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho
Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Coeur d'Alene Tribe could not maintain an action against the state of Idaho to press its claim to Lake Coeur d'Alene due to the state's Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit, notwithstanding the exception recognized in Ex parte Young. The case was an important precedent for aboriginal title in the United States and sovereign immunity in the United States.
Wikipage redirect
seeAlso
primaryTopic
Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho
Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Coeur d'Alene Tribe could not maintain an action against the state of Idaho to press its claim to Lake Coeur d'Alene due to the state's Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit, notwithstanding the exception recognized in Ex parte Young. The case was an important precedent for aboriginal title in the United States and sovereign immunity in the United States.
has abstract
Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe o ...... Idaho v. United States (2001).
@en
Wikipage page ID
31,364,863
Wikipage revision ID
743,741,875
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
citation
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
The Tribe's suit is not covere ...... n to state immunity from suit.
JoinConcurrence
JoinDissent
Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer
JoinMajority
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas
Litigants
Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho
majority
Prior
SCOTUS
Subsequent
subject
comment
Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe o ...... immunity in the United States.
@en
label
Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, etc., et al.
@en