International Salt Co. v. United States
International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392 (1947), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Sherman Act prohibits as per se violations all tying arrangements in which a product for which a seller has a legal monopoly, such as a patent, requires purchasers to also buy a product for which the seller has no legal monopoly.
332 U.S. 392332 US 392International Salt Co. v. U.S.International Salt Co. v. USInternational Salt Co. v United StatesInternational Salt Company v. U.S.International Salt Company v. USInternational Salt Company v. United StatesInternational Salt v. U.S.International Salt v. USInternational Salt v. United States
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
International Salt Co. v. United States
International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392 (1947), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Sherman Act prohibits as per se violations all tying arrangements in which a product for which a seller has a legal monopoly, such as a patent, requires purchasers to also buy a product for which the seller has no legal monopoly.
has abstract
International Salt Co. v. Unit ...... seller has no legal monopoly.
@en
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
732,142,876
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
citation
Concurrence/Dissent
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
The Court held that the Sherma ...... seller has no legal monopoly.
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
JoinMajority
Frankfurter, Reed, Burton
Vinson, Douglas, Murphy, Rutledge ;
LawsApplied
Litigants
International Salt Co. v. United States
majority
Prior
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York
SCOTUS
subject
comment
International Salt Co. v. Unit ...... seller has no legal monopoly.
@en
label
International Salt Co. v. United States
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
International Salt Company, Incorporated v. United States
@en