Irving v Penguin Books Ltd
David Irving v Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt is a case in English law against American author Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher Penguin Books, filed in an English court by the British author David Irving in 1996, asserting that Lipstadt had libeled him in her book Denying the Holocaust. The court ruled that the Irving's claim of libel relating to English defamation law and Holocaust denial was not valid because his deliberate distortion of evidence has been shown to be substantially true. English libel law puts the burden of proof on the defence, meaning that it was up to Lipstadt and her publisher to prove that her claims of Irving's deliberate misrepresentation of evidence to conform to his ideological viewpoints were substantially true.
David Irving libel caseDavid Irving v. Penguin Books and Deborah LipstadtDavid Irving v Penguin Books and Deborah LipstadtHistory on trialIrving v. LibstadtIrving v. LipstadtIrving v. LipstatIrving v. PenguinIrving v. Penguin Books and LipstadtIrving v. Penguin and LipstadtIrving v. Penguin books and LipstadtIrving v. lipstadtIrving v. penguinIrving v. penguin and lipstadtIrving v. penguin books and lipstadtIrving v LipstadtIrving v Penguin Books and LipstadtIrving v Penguin books and LipstadtIrving v lipstadtIrving v penguin books and lipstadtIvP&L
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Irving v Penguin Books Ltd
David Irving v Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt is a case in English law against American author Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher Penguin Books, filed in an English court by the British author David Irving in 1996, asserting that Lipstadt had libeled him in her book Denying the Holocaust. The court ruled that the Irving's claim of libel relating to English defamation law and Holocaust denial was not valid because his deliberate distortion of evidence has been shown to be substantially true. English libel law puts the burden of proof on the defence, meaning that it was up to Lipstadt and her publisher to prove that her claims of Irving's deliberate misrepresentation of evidence to conform to his ideological viewpoints were substantially true.
has abstract
David Irving v Penguin Books a ...... orical record of World War II.
@en
El caso de Irving contra Lipst ...... íticas que en ello culminaron.
@es
Процесс Ирвинг против Липштадт ...... ём не только в Великобритании.
@ru
thumbnail
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
23,235,716
Wikipage revision ID
744,666,307
citations
date decided
2000-04-11
full name
Irving v Penguin Books Limited, Deborah E. Lipstadt
name
Irving v Penguin and Lipstadt
opinions
... the evidence supports the ...... nce of justification succeeds.
subsequent actions
Application for appeal denied
transcripts
subject
hypernym
comment
David Irving v Penguin Books a ...... oints were substantially true.
@en
El caso de Irving contra Lipst ...... tencia el 11 de abril de 2000.
@es
Процесс Ирвинг против Липштадт ...... ём не только в Великобритании.
@ru
label
Irving contra Lipstadt y otros
@es
Irving v Penguin Books Ltd
@en
Процесс Ирвинг против Липштадт
@ru