Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 (2000) was a United States Supreme Court case that determined that the Congress's enforcement powers under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution did not extend to the abrogation of state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment where the discrimination complained of was rationally based on age.
primaryTopic
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 (2000) was a United States Supreme Court case that determined that the Congress's enforcement powers under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution did not extend to the abrogation of state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment where the discrimination complained of was rationally based on age.
has abstract
Kimel v. Florida Board of Rege ...... f was rationally based on age.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
731,739,208
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
citation
Concurrence/Dissent
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
Congress's enforcement powers ...... ion in Employment Act of 1967.
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
JoinMajority
Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas ; Rehnquist, Stevens, Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
LawsApplied
Litigants
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents
majority
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Kimel v. Florida Board of Rege ...... f was rationally based on age.
@en
label
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
J. Daniel Kimel, Jr. et al. v. Florida Board of Regents et al.
@en