Kyllo v. United States
Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), held that the use of a thermal imaging, or FLIR, device from a public vantage point to monitor the radiation of heat from a person's home was a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, and thus required a warrant.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Kyllo v. United States
Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), held that the use of a thermal imaging, or FLIR, device from a public vantage point to monitor the radiation of heat from a person's home was a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, and thus required a warrant.
has abstract
Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. ...... , and thus required a warrant.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
742,748,305
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27
citation
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
Thermal imaging of a home cons ...... y be done only with a warrant.
JoinDissent
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy
JoinMajority
Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
justia
Litigants
Kyllo v. United States
majority
other source
other url
Prior
On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. ...... , and thus required a warrant.
@en
label
Kyllo v. United States
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Danny Lee Kyllo v. United States
@en