Loizidou v. Turkey
Loizidou v. Turkey is a landmark legal case regarding the rights of refugees wishing to return to their former homes and properties. The European Court of Human Rights ruled (24 years after she had filed her case) that Mrs. Titina Loizidou, and consequently all other refugees, have the right to return to their former properties. The ECHR ruled that Turkey had violated Mrs. Loizidou's human rights, that she should be allowed to return to her home and that Turkey should pay damages to her. Turkey initially ignored this ruling. The U.S. Department of State commented on this case as follows:
primaryTopic
Loizidou v. Turkey
Loizidou v. Turkey is a landmark legal case regarding the rights of refugees wishing to return to their former homes and properties. The European Court of Human Rights ruled (24 years after she had filed her case) that Mrs. Titina Loizidou, and consequently all other refugees, have the right to return to their former properties. The ECHR ruled that Turkey had violated Mrs. Loizidou's human rights, that she should be allowed to return to her home and that Turkey should pay damages to her. Turkey initially ignored this ruling. The U.S. Department of State commented on this case as follows:
has abstract
Loizidou v. Turkey is a landma ...... e right to enjoy her property.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
683,460,470
subject
comment
Loizidou v. Turkey is a landma ...... ented on this case as follows:
@en
label
Loizidou v. Turkey
@en