Matthew of Westminster
Matthew of Westminster, long regarded as the author of the Flores Historiarum, is now thought never to have existed. The error was first discovered in 1826 by Francis Turner Palgrave, who said that Matthew was "a phantom who never existed," and later the truth of this statement was completely proved by Henry Richards Luard. The name appears to have been taken from that of Matthew Paris, from whose Chronica majora the earlier part of the work was mainly copied, and from Westminster Abbey, where the work was partially written.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Matthew of Westminster
Matthew of Westminster, long regarded as the author of the Flores Historiarum, is now thought never to have existed. The error was first discovered in 1826 by Francis Turner Palgrave, who said that Matthew was "a phantom who never existed," and later the truth of this statement was completely proved by Henry Richards Luard. The name appears to have been taken from that of Matthew Paris, from whose Chronica majora the earlier part of the work was mainly copied, and from Westminster Abbey, where the work was partially written.
has abstract
Matthew de Westminster fue con ...... obra fue escrita parcialmente.
@es
Matthew of Westminster, long r ...... he work was partially written.
@en
Matthieu de Westminster est le ...... sées sur la genèse de l'œuvre.
@fr
Матфей Вестминстерский (англ. ...... стерскийМатфей Вестминстерский
@ru
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
667,747,354
subject
comment
Matthew de Westminster fue con ...... obra fue escrita parcialmente.
@es
Matthew of Westminster, long r ...... he work was partially written.
@en
Matthieu de Westminster est le ...... sées sur la genèse de l'œuvre.
@fr
Матфей Вестминстерский (англ. ...... работа была частично написана.
@ru
label
Matthew de Westminster
@es
Matthew of Westminster
@en
Matthieu de Westminster
@fr
Матфей Вестминстерский
@ru
wasDerivedFrom
gender
male
@en
givenName
Matthew
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Matthew of Westminster
@en