Michigan v. Jackson
Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court regarding the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel in a police interrogation. In a decision written by Justice Stevens, the Court held that once an accused individual has claimed a right to counsel at a plea hearing or other court proceeding, a waiver of that right during later police questioning would be invalid unless the accused individual initiated the communication. This decision was overruled by the Supreme Court in Montejo v. Louisiana, 556 U.S. 778 (2009), by a 5–4 decision.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Michigan v. Jackson
Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court regarding the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel in a police interrogation. In a decision written by Justice Stevens, the Court held that once an accused individual has claimed a right to counsel at a plea hearing or other court proceeding, a waiver of that right during later police questioning would be invalid unless the accused individual initiated the communication. This decision was overruled by the Supreme Court in Montejo v. Louisiana, 556 U.S. 778 (2009), by a 5–4 decision.
has abstract
Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. ...... 778 (2009), by a 5–4 decision.
@en
Wikipage page ID
22,166,391
Wikipage revision ID
740,473,747
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
The Sixth Amendment right to c ...... ated interrogation is invalid.
JoinDissent
Powell, O'Connor
JoinMajority
Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun
Litigants
Michigan v. Jackson
majority
OralArgument
Overruled
Montejo v. Louisiana
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. ...... 778 (2009), by a 5–4 decision.
@en
label
Michigan v. Jackson
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Michigan v. Robert Bernard Jackson; Michigan v. Rudy Bladel
@en