O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police
O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2005] UKHL 26 was an English evidence law decision of the House of Lords which held that evidence of previous bad behaviour, known as similar fact evidence, may be admitted in civil case proceedings if it is probative of a relevant matter.
seeAlso
primaryTopic
O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police
O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2005] UKHL 26 was an English evidence law decision of the House of Lords which held that evidence of previous bad behaviour, known as similar fact evidence, may be admitted in civil case proceedings if it is probative of a relevant matter.
has abstract
O'Brien v Chief Constable of S ...... robative of a relevant matter.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
48,635,558
Wikipage revision ID
733,434,575
citations
[2005] UKHL 26
court
House of Lords
date decided
2005-04-28
full name
O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police
judges
Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord ...... f Earlsferry and Lord Carswell
keywords
name
O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police
prior actions
[2003] EWCA Civ 1085
transcripts
hypernym
comment
O'Brien v Chief Constable of S ...... robative of a relevant matter.
@en
label
O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police
@en