Alabama v. North Carolina
Alabama v. North Carolina, 560 U.S. 330 (2010), was an original jurisdiction United States Supreme Court case. It arose from a disagreement between the state of North Carolina and the other members of the Southeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact over the funding for a joint project. Eight states had formed the compact in 1983 to manage low-level radioactive waste in the southeastern United States. In 1986, North Carolina was chosen as the location for the regional waste facility, and it asked the other states for funding to help with the project. The project stalled and was eventually shut down, despite North Carolina receiving $80 million from the other states. After the project's demise, the other states demanded their money back, but North Carolina refused to
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Alabama v. North Carolina
Alabama v. North Carolina, 560 U.S. 330 (2010), was an original jurisdiction United States Supreme Court case. It arose from a disagreement between the state of North Carolina and the other members of the Southeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact over the funding for a joint project. Eight states had formed the compact in 1983 to manage low-level radioactive waste in the southeastern United States. In 1986, North Carolina was chosen as the location for the regional waste facility, and it asked the other states for funding to help with the project. The project stalled and was eventually shut down, despite North Carolina receiving $80 million from the other states. After the project's demise, the other states demanded their money back, but North Carolina refused to
has abstract
Alabama v. North Carolina, 560 ...... ay them, leading to this case.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
59,068,034
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,026,040,946
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Alabama v. North Carolina,
@en
Concurrence
Kennedy
@en
Concurrence/Dissent
Breyer
@en
Roberts
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
State of Alabama, State of Flo ...... ffs v. State of North Carolina
@en
Holding
North Carolina was not prohibi ...... nctions against North Carolina
@en
JoinConcurrence
Sotomayor
@en
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
Roberts
@en
Thomas
@en
JoinMajority
Stevens, Ginsburg, Alito; Roberts ; Kennedy, Sotomayor ; Thomas ; Breyer
@en
LawsApplied
Southeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact
@en
Litigants
Alabama v. North Carolina
@en
majority
Scalia
@en
Opinion
OralArgument
oyez
ParallelCitations
project
wikisource
@en
text
Wikisource has original text related to this article: Alabama v. North Carolina
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Alabama v. North Carolina, 560 ...... but North Carolina refused to
@en
label
Alabama v. North Carolina
@en
sameAs
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
State of Alabama, State of Flo ...... ffs v. State of North Carolina
@en