Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Christopher Hill Ltd
Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Christopher Hill Ltd. (1972; AC 441) is a UK commercial law case concerning legal liability for the damages resulting from the loss of a large number of mink given toxic feed. The heart of the case revolved around the definition of ingredients in the contract (in accordance with section 13 of the Sale of Goods Act of 1893) and the expectations of quality of those ingredients (under 14(1) and 14(2)).
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Christopher Hill Ltd
Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Christopher Hill Ltd. (1972; AC 441) is a UK commercial law case concerning legal liability for the damages resulting from the loss of a large number of mink given toxic feed. The heart of the case revolved around the definition of ingredients in the contract (in accordance with section 13 of the Sale of Goods Act of 1893) and the expectations of quality of those ingredients (under 14(1) and 14(2)).
has abstract
Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Chri ...... had reason to know the risks.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
30,983,393
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
814,683,956
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
bot
InternetArchiveBot
@en
date
October 2016
@en
fix-attempted
yes
@en
full name
Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Christopher Hill Ltd.
@en
italic title
yes
@en
judges
keywords
name
Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Christopher Hill Ltd.
@en
opinions
With respect to contracts to s ...... have reason to know the risks.
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
hypernym
comment
Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Chri ...... ients (under 14(1) and 14(2)).
@en
label
Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Christopher Hill Ltd
@en