Auer v. Robbins
Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997), is a United States Supreme Court case that concerns the standard that the Court should apply when it reviews an executive department's interpretation of regulations established under federal legislation. The specific issue was whether sergeants and lieutenants in the St. Louis Police Department should be paid for working overtime. The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 established the overtime pay requirement, and the US Department of Labor issued regulations to determine if an employee was covered by the overtime requirement.
Wikipage disambiguates
Wikipage redirect
519 U.S. 452AuerAuer deferenceAuer v RobbinsG.G. v. Gloucester County School BoardGender identity under Title IXGonzales v. OregonKisor v. WilkieList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist CourtList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts CourtList of United States administrative law casesUnited States administrative lawUnited States labor law
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Auer v. Robbins
Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997), is a United States Supreme Court case that concerns the standard that the Court should apply when it reviews an executive department's interpretation of regulations established under federal legislation. The specific issue was whether sergeants and lieutenants in the St. Louis Police Department should be paid for working overtime. The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 established the overtime pay requirement, and the US Department of Labor issued regulations to determine if an employee was covered by the overtime requirement.
has abstract
Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 ...... rpretation of the regulations.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
10,824,244
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,018,611,323
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Auer v. Robbins,
@en
cornell
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
Francis Bernard Auer, et al., Petitioners v. David A. Robbins, et al.
@en
googlescholar
Holding
Sergeants and lieutenants are ...... preting their own regulations.
@en
JoinMajority
unanimous
@en
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
Auer v. Robbins
@en
majority
Scalia
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 ...... d by the overtime requirement.
@en
label
Auer v. Robbins
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Francis Bernard Auer, et al., Petitioners v. David A. Robbins, et al.
@en