Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, 546 U.S. 320 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving a facial challenge to New Hampshire's parental notification abortion law. The First Circuit had ruled that the law was unconstitutional and an injunction against its enforcement was proper. The Supreme Court vacated this judgment and remanded the case, but avoided a substantive ruling on the challenged law or a reconsideration of prior Supreme Court abortion precedent. Instead, the Court only addressed the issue of remedy, holding that invalidating a statute in its entirety "is not always necessary or justified, for lower courts may be able to render narrower declaratory and injunctive relief."
Wikipage disambiguates
546 U.S. 320Abortion in New HampshireAbortion lawAyotteAyotte v. Planned ParenthoodAyotte v. Planned Parenthood of New EnglandAyotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng.Ayotte v Planned Parenthood of Northern New EnglandCraig BensonFacial challengeGonzales v. CarhartJuan R. TorruellaList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts CourtList of court cases involving Alliance Defending FreedomList of court cases involving the American Civil Liberties UnionPlanned ParenthoodSandra Day O'ConnorTimeline of women's legal rights (other than voting)Timeline of women's legal rights in the United States (other than voting)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
seeAlso
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, 546 U.S. 320 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving a facial challenge to New Hampshire's parental notification abortion law. The First Circuit had ruled that the law was unconstitutional and an injunction against its enforcement was proper. The Supreme Court vacated this judgment and remanded the case, but avoided a substantive ruling on the challenged law or a reconsideration of prior Supreme Court abortion precedent. Instead, the Court only addressed the issue of remedy, holding that invalidating a statute in its entirety "is not always necessary or justified, for lower courts may be able to render narrower declaratory and injunctive relief."
has abstract
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood o ...... etirement on January 31, 2006.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,024,234,182
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England,
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
Kelly A. Ayotte, Attorney Gene ...... f Northern New England, et al.
@en
Holding
Completely invalidating a pare ...... Appeals vacated and remanded.
@en
JoinMajority
unanimous
@en
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England
@en
majority
O'Connor
@en
other source
Supreme Court
@en
other url
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood o ...... ratory and injunctive relief."
@en
label
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Kelly A. Ayotte, Attorney Gene ...... f Northern New England, et al.
@en