Bangorian Controversy
The Bangorian Controversy was a theological argument within the Church of England in the early 18th century, with strong political overtones. The origins of the controversy lay in the 1716 posthumous publication of George Hickes's Constitution of the Catholic Church, and the Nature and Consequences of Schism. In it, Hickes, as Bishop of Thetford, on behalf of the minority non-juror faction that had broken away from the Church of England after the Glorious Revolution, excommunicated all but the non-juror churchmen. Benjamin Hoadly, the Bishop of Bangor, wrote a reply, Preservative against the Principles and Practices of Non-Jurors; his own Erastian position was sincerely proposed as the only test of truth.
Wikipage redirect
1716 in Great Britain17171717 in Great Britain1717 in Wales1717 in literature1718 in literature1718 in poetry1761 in literatureAndrew SnapeAnglican doctrineArthur Ashley SykesBangorianBangorian controversyBenjamin_HoadlyConvocationConvocations of Canterbury and YorkDaniel WhitbyEdward TenisonFrancis Hare (bishop)George Hickes (divine)Henry Hoare (1807–1866)Hoadly affairJohn BalguyJohn Rogers (priest)Joseph Smith (academic)Joseph TrappLatitudinarianList of works by Arthur Ashley SykesMarch 31Ofspring_BlackallSamuel BoldSamuel WerenfelsThe Vicar of BrayThe Vicar of Bray (song)Thomas Gordon (writer)Thomas GwatkinThomas HerneThomas HerringThomas Lewis (controversialist)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Bangorian Controversy
The Bangorian Controversy was a theological argument within the Church of England in the early 18th century, with strong political overtones. The origins of the controversy lay in the 1716 posthumous publication of George Hickes's Constitution of the Catholic Church, and the Nature and Consequences of Schism. In it, Hickes, as Bishop of Thetford, on behalf of the minority non-juror faction that had broken away from the Church of England after the Glorious Revolution, excommunicated all but the non-juror churchmen. Benjamin Hoadly, the Bishop of Bangor, wrote a reply, Preservative against the Principles and Practices of Non-Jurors; his own Erastian position was sincerely proposed as the only test of truth.
has abstract
La controversia bangoriana fue ...... ar obispos de entre los Lores.
@es
The Bangorian Controversy was ...... hority to any representatives.
@en
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,012,158,087
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
comment
La controversia bangoriana fue ...... la única prueba de la verdad.
@es
The Bangorian Controversy was ...... sed as the only test of truth.
@en
label
Bangorian Controversy
@en
Controversia bangoriana
@es