Bullcoming v. New Mexico
Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647 (2011), is a significant 6th Amendment Confrontation Clause case decided by the United States Supreme Court. On June 23, 2011, the Supreme Court considered the issue whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights extend to a non-testifying laboratory analyst whose supervisor testifies as to test results that the analyst transcribed from a machine. In a five to four decision authored by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held that the second surrogate analyst could not testify about the testimonial statements in the forensic report of the certifying analyst under the Confrontation Clause.
Wikipage redirect
564 U.S. 647Anthony KennedyBullcoming v New MexicoConfrontation ClauseGary King (politician)Jeffrey L. FisherList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts CourtList of United States Supreme Court cases involving constitutional criminal procedureSixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Bullcoming v. New Mexico
Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647 (2011), is a significant 6th Amendment Confrontation Clause case decided by the United States Supreme Court. On June 23, 2011, the Supreme Court considered the issue whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights extend to a non-testifying laboratory analyst whose supervisor testifies as to test results that the analyst transcribed from a machine. In a five to four decision authored by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held that the second surrogate analyst could not testify about the testimonial statements in the forensic report of the certifying analyst under the Confrontation Clause.
has abstract
Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 ...... y to "testimonial" statements.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
31,267,421
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,026,038,509
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Bullcoming v. New Mexico,
@en
Concurrence
Sotomayor
@en
cornell
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Kennedy
@en
fullname
Donald Bullcoming v. State of New Mexico
@en
googlescholar
Holding
A second surrogate analyst's t ...... ates the Confrontation Clause.
@en
JoinDissent
Roberts, Breyer, Alito
@en
JoinMajority
Scalia; Sotomayor, Kagan ; Thomas
@en
justia
Litigants
Bullcoming v. New Mexico
@en
majority
Ginsburg
@en
other source
Supreme Court
@en
other url
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 ...... nder the Confrontation Clause.
@en
label
Bullcoming v. New Mexico
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Donald Bullcoming v. State of New Mexico
@en