Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897), was a ruling that determined the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required states to provide just compensation for seizing private property.
166 U.S. 226Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. ChicagoChicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v ChicagoChicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago,Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. ChicagoChicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoEminent domain in the United StatesFederal Declaration of Taking Act of 1931Fifth Amendment to the United States ConstitutionFourteenth Amendment to the United States ConstitutionFuller CourtGitlow v. New YorkIncorporation of the Bill of RightsJohn_Marshall_HarlanList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Fuller CourtQuincy Railways v. ChicagoWashington v. Texas
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897), was a ruling that determined the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required states to provide just compensation for seizing private property.
has abstract
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R ...... for seizing private property.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
27,838,149
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,024,057,187
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDateA
ArgueDateB
ArgueYear
bot
InternetArchiveBot
@en
case
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago,
@en
courtlistener
date
November 2016
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Brewer
@en
findlaw
fix-attempted
yes
@en
fullname
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago
@en
googlescholar
Holding
The 14th Amendment's due proce ...... for seizing private property.
@en
JoinMajority
Field, Gray, Brown, Shiras, White, Peckham
@en
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago
@en
majority
Harlan
@en
NotParticipating
Fuller
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R ...... for seizing private property.
@en
label
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago
@en