Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minnesota
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Minnesota, 134 U.S. 418 (1890), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that procedural due process limits state regulatory power over railroad rates. A regulatory agency in Minnesota had set railroad rates that the Minnesota Supreme Court had refused to overturn. When the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad appealed the case, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the rates were set without due process of law, specifically without an opportunity to challenge the equality and reasonableness of the charges. The Minnesota court had sanctioned rate-setting without any judicial hearing, requirement of notice or witnesses, "-in fact, nothing which has the semblance of due process of law".
134 U.S. 418Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co. v. MinnesotaChicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad v. MinnesotaChicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. MinnesotaChicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v MinnesotaJoseph P. BradleyList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Fuller CourtRailroad Commission CasesSamuel BlatchfordWaite Court
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minnesota
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Minnesota, 134 U.S. 418 (1890), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that procedural due process limits state regulatory power over railroad rates. A regulatory agency in Minnesota had set railroad rates that the Minnesota Supreme Court had refused to overturn. When the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad appealed the case, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the rates were set without due process of law, specifically without an opportunity to challenge the equality and reasonableness of the charges. The Minnesota court had sanctioned rate-setting without any judicial hearing, requirement of notice or witnesses, "-in fact, nothing which has the semblance of due process of law".
has abstract
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul ...... and not that of the judiciary.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
13,427,293
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
922,660,802
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDateA
ArgueDateB
ArgueYear
case
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minnesota,
@en
Concurrence
Miller
@en
cornell
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Bradley
@en
findlaw
fullname
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul a ...... lroad and Warehouse Commission
@en
googlescholar
Holding
Procedural due process applies to state regulatory action.
@en
JoinDissent
Gray, Lamar
@en
JoinMajority
Fuller, Field, Harlan, Brewer
@en
justia
Litigants
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Minnesota
@en
majority
Blatchford
@en
ParallelCitations
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul ...... blance of due process of law".
@en
label
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minnesota
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul a ...... lroad and Warehouse Commission
@en