Commissioner v. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A.
Commissioner v. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A., 405 U.S. 394 (1972), was a Supreme Court case holding that a bank prohibited from doing insurance business did not need to include in gross income the insurance commissions on credit life insurance that the bank referred to an unrelated insurance company. The case syllabus says that "no share of premium received by life insurance company on business referred to it by commonly controlled national banks could be attributed to banks, and holding company did not utilize its control over banks and insurance company to distort their true net incomes, although banks encouraged lenders to take out insurance and referred them to insurance company, where federal banking laws would have prohibited banks from receiving share in premiums."
Commissioner v. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A.
Commissioner v. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A., 405 U.S. 394 (1972), was a Supreme Court case holding that a bank prohibited from doing insurance business did not need to include in gross income the insurance commissions on credit life insurance that the bank referred to an unrelated insurance company. The case syllabus says that "no share of premium received by life insurance company on business referred to it by commonly controlled national banks could be attributed to banks, and holding company did not utilize its control over banks and insurance company to distort their true net incomes, although banks encouraged lenders to take out insurance and referred them to insurance company, where federal banking laws would have prohibited banks from receiving share in premiums."
has abstract
Commissioner v. First Security ...... receiving share in premiums."
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
14,513,212
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
895,896,359
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Commissioner v. First Security Bank of Utah,
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Blackmun
@en
Marshall
@en
findlaw
fullname
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. First Security Bank of Utah, N. A., et al.
@en
googlescholar
Holding
A bank prohibited from doing i ...... n unrelated insurance company.
@en
JoinDissent
White
@en
JoinMajority
Burger, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, Rehnquist
@en
justia
Litigants
Commissioner v. First Security Bank of Utah, N. A.
@en
majority
Powell
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Commissioner v. First Security ...... receiving share in premiums."
@en
label
Commissioner v. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A.
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. First Security Bank of Utah, N. A., et al.
@en