Connick v. Thompson
Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51 (2011), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether a prosecutor's office can be held liable for a single Brady violation by one of its members on the theory that the office provided inadequate training.
Wikipage redirect
563 U.S. 51Brady v. MarylandConnick v ThompsonConviction and exoneration of Glenn FordHarry Connick Sr.John ThompsonList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts CourtList of exonerated death row inmatesList of wrongful convictions in the United StatesMonell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Connick v. Thompson
Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51 (2011), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether a prosecutor's office can be held liable for a single Brady violation by one of its members on the theory that the office provided inadequate training.
has abstract
Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. ...... provided inadequate training.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
31,267,380
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,022,368,590
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51
@en
Concurrence
Scalia
@en
cornell
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Ginsburg
@en
fullname
Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson
@en
googlescholar
Holding
A district attorneys office ca ...... yland. Fifth Circuit reversed.
@en
JoinConcurrence
Alito
@en
JoinDissent
Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
@en
JoinMajority
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Alito
@en
justia
Litigants
Connick v. Thompson
@en
majority
Thomas
@en
other source
Supreme Court
@en
other url
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
Subsequent
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. ...... provided inadequate training.
@en
label
Connick v. Thompson
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson
@en