Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)
Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12 is a case of the Supreme Court of Canada, which ruled that Métis and non-status Indians are "Indians" for the purpose of s 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867.
2016 reasons of the Supreme Court of CanadaAudrey PoitrasBand governmentDaniels v. CanadaDaniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)Daniels v CanadaIndex of articles related to Indigenous CanadiansIndigenous peoples in CanadaList of Supreme Court of Canada cases (McLachlin Court)MétisNative Council of Nova ScotiaNon-status IndianNumbered Treaties
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)
Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12 is a case of the Supreme Court of Canada, which ruled that Métis and non-status Indians are "Indians" for the purpose of s 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867.
has abstract
Daniels v Canada (Indian Affai ...... of the Constitution Act, 1867.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
38,645,841
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,003,879,085
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
case-name
Daniels v Canada
@en
citations
decided-date
2016-04-14
Docket
full-case-name
Harry Daniels, Gabriel Daniels ...... and Attorney General of Canada
@en
heard-date
2015-10-08
history
APPEAL and CROSS‑APPEAL from , ...... da 2013 FC 6, [2013] 2 FCR 268
@en
ratio
"Indians" under s. 91 of the C ...... Indigenous peoples in Canada.
@en
ruling
Appeal allowed in part and cross‑appeal dismissed.
@en
Unanimous
Abella J
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Daniels v Canada (Indian Affai ...... of the Constitution Act, 1867.
@en
label
Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)
@en