Danielz v De Wet
In Danielz v De Wet, an important case in the South African law of succession, Danielz was the executor of De Wet's estate. Danielz sought an order declaring the deceased's widow (the sole nominated beneficiary) unworthy of inheriting. The reason for this was that the widow had hired an accomplice to assault the deceased and as a result of the assault, the deceased died. The widow claimed that she had only hired an accomplice to assault the deceased and not to kill him, but both were found guilty of murder.
primaryTopic
Danielz v De Wet
In Danielz v De Wet, an important case in the South African law of succession, Danielz was the executor of De Wet's estate. Danielz sought an order declaring the deceased's widow (the sole nominated beneficiary) unworthy of inheriting. The reason for this was that the widow had hired an accomplice to assault the deceased and as a result of the assault, the deceased died. The widow claimed that she had only hired an accomplice to assault the deceased and not to kill him, but both were found guilty of murder.
has abstract
In Danielz v De Wet, an import ...... ts application to the statute.
@en
Wikipage page ID
40,800,063
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
969,030,331
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
hypernym
type
comment
In Danielz v De Wet, an import ...... h were found guilty of murder.
@en
label
Danielz v De Wet
@en