DeRolph v. State
DeRolph v. State is a landmark case in Ohio constitutional law in which the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that the state's method for funding public education was unconstitutional. On March 24, 1997, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled in a 4–3 decision that the state funding system "fails to provide for a thorough and efficient system of common schools," as required by the Ohio Constitution, and directed the state to find a remedy. The court would look at the case several times over the next 12 years before it relinquished jurisdiction, but the underlying problems with the school funding system remain to this day.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
DeRolph v. State
DeRolph v. State is a landmark case in Ohio constitutional law in which the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that the state's method for funding public education was unconstitutional. On March 24, 1997, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled in a 4–3 decision that the state funding system "fails to provide for a thorough and efficient system of common schools," as required by the Ohio Constitution, and directed the state to find a remedy. The court would look at the case several times over the next 12 years before it relinquished jurisdiction, but the underlying problems with the school funding system remain to this day.
has abstract
DeRolph v. State is a landmark ...... ing system remain to this day.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
21,333,934
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,020,017,026
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
bot
InternetArchiveBot
@en
date
July 2019
@en
fix-attempted
yes
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
DeRolph v. State is a landmark ...... ing system remain to this day.
@en
label
DeRolph v. State
@en