Diamond v. Charles
Diamond v. Charles, 476 U.S. 54 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case that determined that citizens do not have Article III standing to challenge the constitutionality of a state statute in federal court unless they possess a "direct stake" in the outcome.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Diamond v. Charles
Diamond v. Charles, 476 U.S. 54 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case that determined that citizens do not have Article III standing to challenge the constitutionality of a state statute in federal court unless they possess a "direct stake" in the outcome.
has abstract
Diamond v. Charles, 476 U.S. 5 ...... "direct stake" in the outcome.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
39,871,527
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,017,082,656
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Diamond v. Charles,
@en
Concurrence
O'Connor
@en
White
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
Eugene F. Diamond and Jasper F. Williams, et al. v. Allan G. Charles et al.
@en
Holding
The State of Illinois, by fail ...... ssed for want of jurisdiction.
@en
JoinConcurrence
Burger, Rehnquist
@en
JoinMajority
Brennan, Marshall, Powell, Stevens, Burger , Rehnquist , O'Connor , White
@en
justia
LawsApplied
U.S. Const. art. III §2
@en
Litigants
Diamond v. Charles
@en
majority
Blackmun
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Diamond v. Charles, 476 U.S. 5 ...... "direct stake" in the outcome.
@en
label
Diamond v. Charles
@en
sameAs
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Eugene F. Diamond and Jasper F. Williams, et al. v. Allan G. Charles et al.
@en