Fitzgerald v Muldoon
Fitzgerald v Muldoon and Others is one of New Zealand's leading constitutional law decisions. Heard in the Supreme Court in 1976, the decision considered whether press statements by the Prime Minister Robert Muldoon had breached section 1 of the Bill of Rights 1688, "That the pretended power of suspending of laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, without consent of Parliament, is illegal".
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Fitzgerald v Muldoon
Fitzgerald v Muldoon and Others is one of New Zealand's leading constitutional law decisions. Heard in the Supreme Court in 1976, the decision considered whether press statements by the Prime Minister Robert Muldoon had breached section 1 of the Bill of Rights 1688, "That the pretended power of suspending of laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, without consent of Parliament, is illegal".
has abstract
Fitzgerald v Muldoon and Other ...... nt of Parliament, is illegal".
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
46,336,554
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,017,495,151
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
citations
[1976] 2 NZLR 615
@en
date decided
1976-06-11
judges
Wild CJ
@en
keywords
Bill of Rights 1688, separation of powers, Parliamentary supremacy, Constitutional law
@en
name
Fitzgerald v Muldoon and Others
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
type
comment
Fitzgerald v Muldoon and Other ...... nt of Parliament, is illegal".
@en
label
Fitzgerald v Muldoon
@en