Graham v. Connor
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court determined that an objective reasonableness standard should apply to a civilian's claim that law enforcement officials used excessive force in the course of making an arrest, investigatory stop, or other "seizure" of his or her person.
Wikipage redirect
490 U.S. 386Bryan v. MacPhersonDeadly forceGraham v. ConnerGraham v ConnorList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist CourtMullenix v. LunaPolice brutality in the United StatesPolice use of deadly force in the United StatesRight to lifeSan Francisco tech bus protestsShooting of James BoydTennessee v. GarnerUse-of-force law in MissouriUse of forceUse of force continuum
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Graham v. Connor
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court determined that an objective reasonableness standard should apply to a civilian's claim that law enforcement officials used excessive force in the course of making an arrest, investigatory stop, or other "seizure" of his or her person.
has abstract
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 ...... seizure" of his or her person.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
11,026,460
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,020,073,585
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Graham v. Connor,
@en
Concurrence
Blackmun
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
Dethorne Graham v. Connor, et al.
@en
Holding
An objective reasonableness st ...... her "seizure" of their person.
@en
JoinConcurrence
Brennan, Marshall
@en
JoinMajority
White, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy
@en
justia
Litigants
Graham v. Connor
@en
majority
Rehnquist
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 ...... seizure" of his or her person.
@en
label
Graham v. Connor
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Dethorne Graham v. Connor, et al.
@en