Hamed v R
Hamed & Ors v. R [2011] NZSC 101 was a decision by the Supreme Court of New Zealand which ruled on the admissibility of video surveillance. The ruling held that evidence collected using criminal trespass on private land to conduct covert surveillance under a warrant is only admissible for serious crimes. The charges involved were related to the 2007 New Zealand anti-terror raids, as a result of the ruling, charges against all but four of the defendants were dropped.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Hamed v R
Hamed & Ors v. R [2011] NZSC 101 was a decision by the Supreme Court of New Zealand which ruled on the admissibility of video surveillance. The ruling held that evidence collected using criminal trespass on private land to conduct covert surveillance under a warrant is only admissible for serious crimes. The charges involved were related to the 2007 New Zealand anti-terror raids, as a result of the ruling, charges against all but four of the defendants were dropped.
has abstract
Hamed & Ors v. R [2011] NZSC 1 ...... uced and passed under urgency.
@en
Wikipage page ID
33,310,928
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
818,748,687
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
citations
[2011] NZSC 101
@en
date decided
2011-09-02
judges
Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath and Gault JJ
@en
name
Hamed & Ors v. R
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
comment
Hamed & Ors v. R [2011] NZSC 1 ...... f the defendants were dropped.
@en
label
Hamed v R
@en