Hudson v. Palmer
Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that prison inmates have no privacy rights in their cells protected by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court also held that an intentional deprivation of property by a state employee "does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment if an adequate postdeprivation state remedy exists," extending Parratt v. Taylor to intentional torts.
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Hudson v. Palmer
Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that prison inmates have no privacy rights in their cells protected by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court also held that an intentional deprivation of property by a state employee "does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment if an adequate postdeprivation state remedy exists," extending Parratt v. Taylor to intentional torts.
has abstract
Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 ...... . Taylor to intentional torts.
@en
Wikipage page ID
59,706,441
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,002,659,101
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
Concurrence
O'Connor
@en
Concurrence/Dissent
Stevens
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
Ted S. Hudson, Petitioner v. R ...... ., Petitioner v. Ted S. Hudson
@en
Holding
Prison inmates have no reasona ...... d adequate state law remedies.
@en
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
Brennan, Marshall, and Blackmun
@en
JoinMajority
White, Powell, Rehnquist, and O'Connor
@en
LawsApplied
U.S. Const. amend. IV; U.S. Const. amend XIV
@en
Litigants
Hudson v. Palmer
@en
Palmer v. Hudson
@en
majority
Burger
@en
OralArgument
ParallelCitations
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
comment
Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 ...... . Taylor to intentional torts.
@en
label
Hudson v. Palmer
@en
sameAs
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Ted S. Hudson, Petitioner v. R ...... ., Petitioner v. Ted S. Hudson
@en