Kunz v. New York
Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case finding a requirement mandating a permit to speak on religious issues in public was unconstitutional. It was argued October 17, 1950, and decided January 15, 1951, 8–1. Chief Justice Vinson delivered the opinion for the Court. Justice Black and Justice Frankfurter concurred in the result only. Justice Jackson dissented.
Wikipage redirect
340 U.S. 290Abrams v. United StatesBrandenburg v. OhioChaplinsky v. New HampshireDennis v. United StatesFeiner v. New YorkHess v. IndianaKunz v New YorkKunzeList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Vinson CourtList of court cases involving the American Civil Liberties UnionMasses Publishing Co. v. PattenSacher v. United StatesSchenck v. United StatesTerminiello v. City of ChicagoWhitney v. California
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Kunz v. New York
Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case finding a requirement mandating a permit to speak on religious issues in public was unconstitutional. It was argued October 17, 1950, and decided January 15, 1951, 8–1. Chief Justice Vinson delivered the opinion for the Court. Justice Black and Justice Frankfurter concurred in the result only. Justice Jackson dissented.
has abstract
Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 ...... rs during their presentations.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
13,526,763
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
939,779,742
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Kunz v. New York,
@en
Concurrence
Black
@en
Frankfurter
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Jackson
@en
fullname
Kunz v. New York
@en
googlescholar
JoinMajority
Reed, Douglas, Burton, Clark, Minton
@en
justia
Litigants
Kunz v. New York
@en
majority
Vinson
@en
ParallelCitations
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 ...... ly. Justice Jackson dissented.
@en
label
Kunz v. New York
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Kunz v. New York
@en