Lux v. Haggin
Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 P. 674; (1886), is a historic case in the conflict between riparian and appropriative water rights. Decided by a vote of four to three in the Supreme Court of California, the ruling held that appropriative rights were secondary to riparian rights.
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Lux v. Haggin
Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 P. 674; (1886), is a historic case in the conflict between riparian and appropriative water rights. Decided by a vote of four to three in the Supreme Court of California, the ruling held that appropriative rights were secondary to riparian rights.
has abstract
Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 ...... secondary to riparian rights.
@en
Wikipage page ID
35,204,151
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
916,575,469
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
AssociateJudges
Elisha W. McKinstry, Samuel B. ...... kine M. Ross, Milton H. Myrick
@en
ChiefJudge
citations
; 10 P. 674
@en
Concurrence
McKee, Sharpstein, Thornton
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Myrick
@en
Ross
@en
fullname
Charles Lux et al., Appellants ...... and Canal Company, Respondent
@en
Holding
Riparian water rights are supe ...... mitted with just compensation.
@en
JoinDissent
Morrison
@en
Litigants
Lux v. Haggin
@en
majority
McKinstry
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 ...... secondary to riparian rights.
@en
label
Lux v. Haggin
@en