Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein

HRH the Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein, was a decision of the English Court of Appeal relating to the conflict of laws, and specifically whether the English courts should take jurisdiction in relation to a claim which had no substantial connections with England on the basis that the defendant was served with proceedings during a brief visit to the country. However the principle established by the case that presence within the jurisdiction is not negated only because it is a short or transient presence remains good law.

Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein

HRH the Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein, was a decision of the English Court of Appeal relating to the conflict of laws, and specifically whether the English courts should take jurisdiction in relation to a claim which had no substantial connections with England on the basis that the defendant was served with proceedings during a brief visit to the country. However the principle established by the case that presence within the jurisdiction is not negated only because it is a short or transient presence remains good law.