Mapp v. Ohio
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents prosecutors from using evidence in court that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies not only to the U.S. federal government, but also to the U.S. states. The Supreme Court accomplished this by use of a principle known as selective incorporation; in Mapp this involved the incorporation of the provisions, as interpreted by the Court, of the Fourth Amendment which is applicable only to actions of the federal government into the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause which is applicable to actions of the states.
known for
Wikipage disambiguates
367 U.S. 643Admissible evidenceAguilar–Spinelli testAmerican Civil Liberties UnionAmy Coney BarrettAugust RebellionDollree MappDollree Mapp v. OhioEarl_WarrenElkins v. United StatesEngel v. VitaleExclusionary ruleFourteenth Amendment to the United States ConstitutionFourth Amendment to the United States ConstitutionFruit of the poisonous treeHerring v. United StatesHistory of the Supreme Court of the United StatesHudson v. MichiganHugo_BlackIllinois v. McArthurIncorporation of the Bill of RightsIntelligence-led policingJune 1961Ker v. CaliforniaLandmark Cases: Historic Supreme Court DecisionsList of Terry stop case lawsList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren CourtList of court cases involving the American Civil Liberties UnionList of criminal competenciesList of landmark court decisions in the United StatesList of overruled United States Supreme Court decisionsMAPPMancusi v. DeForteMap v. OhioMap versus OhioMapp V. OhioMapp v OhioMapp v ohioMapp versus OhioMapp vs. ohio
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Mapp v. Ohio
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents prosecutors from using evidence in court that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies not only to the U.S. federal government, but also to the U.S. states. The Supreme Court accomplished this by use of a principle known as selective incorporation; in Mapp this involved the incorporation of the provisions, as interpreted by the Court, of the Fourth Amendment which is applicable only to actions of the federal government into the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause which is applicable to actions of the states.
has abstract
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (19 ...... able to actions of the states.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,025,455,168
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Mapp v. Ohio,
@en
Concurrence
Black
@en
Douglas
@en
Stewart
@en
cornell
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Harlan
@en
findlaw
fullname
Dollree Mapp v. State of Ohio
@en
Holding
The Fourth Amendment prohibiti ...... . Ohio Supreme Court reversed.
@en
JoinDissent
Frankfurter, Whittaker
@en
JoinMajority
Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan
@en
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
Mapp v. Ohio
@en
majority
Clark
@en
Overturned previous case
Wolf v. Colorado
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
source
Mapp, 367 U.S. at 657.
@en
Weeks, 232 U.S. at 391–92.
@en
Subsequent
Rehearing denied, .
@en
text
Moreover, our holding that the ...... n which it is bound to uphold.
@en
The effect of the Fourth Amend ...... he maintenance of such rights.
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (19 ...... able to actions of the states.
@en
label
Mapp v. Ohio
@en
seeAlso
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Dollree Mapp v. State of Ohio
@en