McGee v. International Life Insurance Co.
McGee v. International Life Insurance Co., 355 U.S. 220 (1957), was a case following in the line of decisions interpreting International Shoe v. Washington. The Court declared that California did not violate the due process clause by entering a judgment upon a Texas insurance company who was engaged in a dispute over a policy it maintained with a California resident. The importance of this finding is highlighted by the facts of the case; mainly that International Life Insurance did no other business within the state of California besides maintaining this single policy, which the company became responsible for by its acquisition of another insurance company which previously had held the policy. However; the case never explicitly stated that no other business was conducted within California
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
McGee v. International Life Insurance Co.
McGee v. International Life Insurance Co., 355 U.S. 220 (1957), was a case following in the line of decisions interpreting International Shoe v. Washington. The Court declared that California did not violate the due process clause by entering a judgment upon a Texas insurance company who was engaged in a dispute over a policy it maintained with a California resident. The importance of this finding is highlighted by the facts of the case; mainly that International Life Insurance did no other business within the state of California besides maintaining this single policy, which the company became responsible for by its acquisition of another insurance company which previously had held the policy. However; the case never explicitly stated that no other business was conducted within California
has abstract
McGee v. International Life In ...... is presumptive by definition.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
15,666,292
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
895,900,176
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
McGee v. International Life Insurance Co., 355 U.S. 220
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
McGee v. International Life Insurance Company
@en
googlescholar
Holding
California's long-arm statute ...... urance. Reversed and remanded.
@en
JoinMajority
Frankfurter, Douglas, Burton, Clark, Harlan, Brennan, Whittaker
@en
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
McGee v. International Life Insurance Co.
@en
majority
Black
@en
NotParticipating
Warren
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
McGee v. International Life In ...... s conducted within California
@en
label
McGee v. International Life Insurance Co.
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
McGee v. International Life Insurance Company
@en