Mitchel v Reynolds
Mitchel v Reynolds (1711) 1 PWms 181 is decision in the history of the law of restraint of trade, handed down in 1711. It is generally cited for establishing the principle that reasonable restraints of trade, unlike unreasonable restraints of trade, are permissible and therefore enforceable and not a basis for civil or criminal liability. It is largely the basis in US antitrust law for the "rule of reason." William Howard Taft, then Chief Judge of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, later US President and then Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, quoted Mitchel extensively when he first developed the antitrust rule-of-reason doctrine in Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States, which was affirmed in 1899 by the Supreme Court. The doctrine also played a major role in the 1911 Supreme Court
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Mitchel v Reynolds
Mitchel v Reynolds (1711) 1 PWms 181 is decision in the history of the law of restraint of trade, handed down in 1711. It is generally cited for establishing the principle that reasonable restraints of trade, unlike unreasonable restraints of trade, are permissible and therefore enforceable and not a basis for civil or criminal liability. It is largely the basis in US antitrust law for the "rule of reason." William Howard Taft, then Chief Judge of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, later US President and then Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, quoted Mitchel extensively when he first developed the antitrust rule-of-reason doctrine in Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States, which was affirmed in 1899 by the Supreme Court. The doctrine also played a major role in the 1911 Supreme Court
has abstract
Mitchel v Reynolds (1711) 1 PW ...... the proponent of the practice.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
46,335,837
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
989,980,929
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
caption
A bake shop
@en
citations
court
Court of the Queen's Bench
@en
judges
keywords
Restraint of trade
@en
name
Mitchel v Reynolds
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
comment
Mitchel v Reynolds (1711) 1 PW ...... role in the 1911 Supreme Court
@en
label
Mitchel v Reynolds
@en